insulin levels you'll see after the post-workout ingestion of a bolus of glucose. Probably everyone who doesn't vilify insulin and believes blindly in the label claims of supplement producers. After all, D-β-hydroxybutyrate has long been known to promote insulin secretion in animals - two decades ago Laughlin et al. were among the first to realize their insulinogenic prowess (Lauglin 1994).
Even before Laughlin et al. researchers suspected that the ketone-body-induced increases in insulin will go hand in hand with a significant increase in glycogen synthesis as it has been observed in vitro 40 years ago by Maizels et al (1977). What would be news, though, is the fact that this increase would facilitate a statistically significant increase in glycogen synthesis in a real-world post workout situation.
Evidence of performance and cognition enhancing effects as they are promised by some producers of respective supplements have yet also been observed only in rodents (Murray 2016). All evidence in favor of their ergogenic effects should yet, as pointed out by Pinckaers et al in a recent review preliminary because "there are no data available to suggest that ingestion of ketone bodies during exercise improves athletes’ performance under conditions where evidence-based nutritional strategies are applied appropriately" (Pinckaers 2016). If you want to know more about the potential and established usefulness of ketone supplements, I suggest you read their free paper.To reliably assess the subjects' ability to stash away glucose, the researchers decided to use the hyperglycemic clamp according to the method described by de Fronzo and colleagues (DeFronzo 1979). Compared to the provision of a glucose containing drink, the clamp method of providing carbohydrate following exhaustive exercise has, as the scientists rightly point out, three advantages:
glycosyl units/kg dry weight, p < 0.05) than after the control drink" (Holdsworth 2017), because the layman will conclude that the ketone drink triggered a 50%" increase in glycogen synthesis, when the actual comparison of the relative increases in Figure 1 (no such figure in the FT of the original study, be the way), clearly indicates that the difference is as low as 18%.
less than what I recently reported for caffeine and unquestionably less marketable than the 50% increase from the abstract you can easily misunderstand as an inter-group difference, but it is certainly more realistic in view of the fact that the 100% increase in insulin levels (31 vs. 16 mU/l, p < 0.01) sped the whole body glucose uptake (including liver, fat, splanchnic organs etc.) up by "only" 32% (1.66 vs. 1.26 g/kg, p<0.001) - to expect this increase to translate to a 50% increase in glycogen synthesis in the muscle is IMHO quite naive. After all, there's no reason to believe that the exuberant level of insulin would act, as the scientists imply. when they write that any extra glucose that was not stored in the leg musculature (the weight of which they estimate based on data from average Joes and Janes (Janssen 2000), even though their subjects were, I quote, "well-trained") "was probably incorporation into skeletal muscle glycogen", exclusively on the subjects' skeletal muscles - and that's irrespective of the fact that exercise selectively increases skeletal muscle glycogen synthesis.
Bottom line: In view of the fact that the three-day-old study by Vandoorne, et al. (2017), the intriguing results of which I am going to address in a separate article (they are worth it, because they suggest a potential increase in protein synthesis) I didn't just have to expand the previous infobox, I also had to rewrite the bottom line to this article I wrote more than two weeks ago.
As hinted at in the "further research necessary"-box we do now have the research that confirms or rather refutes the practical relevance of the keto-ester-induced increase in insulin and glucose uptake in a non-hyperinsulinemic clamp scenario, I would other have demanded in this bottom line.
Research that did what I demanded in the original version of this conclusion: (a) replace the intravenous infusion of glucose with the ingestion of carbohydrate-containing beverages, (b) include an insulinogenic protein like whey and (c) had subjects with similar baseline glycogen levels? At least with respect to the previously open question whether your glycogen recovery will benefit from the purchase of ketone esters, it is thus now possible to give say with some certainty that the answer is no... just like the answer to the question if it is even relevant for the average gymrat to maximize his/her post-workout glucose synthesis rates (learn more about that in my previous, general article about glycogen repletion) | Comment on Facebook!References:
Even before Laughlin et al. researchers suspected that the ketone-body-induced increases in insulin will go hand in hand with a significant increase in glycogen synthesis as it has been observed in vitro 40 years ago by Maizels et al (1977). What would be news, though, is the fact that this increase would facilitate a statistically significant increase in glycogen synthesis in a real-world post workout situation.
Read about the latest nutrition, exercise & supplementation science on the SuppVersity
That, however, is not what the latest study by Holdsworth et al. shows. While the scientists observed a significant increase in glycogen storage, when they gave their subjects 0.573 ml/kg of the ketone ester, (R)-3-hydroxybutyl (R)-3-hydroxybutyrate, this observation was made in a physiological state that has absolutely nothing to do with the real world: the infusion of glucose during a hyperglycemic insulinemic clamp test during the post-workout period. Before we discard the results as irrelevant, however, let's take a look at what Holdsworth et al, whose study involved twelve male, well-trained, athletes (mean ± SD: age, 33.0 ± 6.5 years; body weight, 75.8 ± 5.0 kg; height, 1.70 ± 0.10 m VO2max, 57.0 ± 4.8 ml/kg/min; peak power output, 316 ± 34 W) with a weekly training volume of 6-8 hours, actually did: They had their subjects perform a standardized glycogen depletion protocol after a 12-hour overnight fast:Then, right after said torturing glycogen depletion exercise, the participants consumed either a ketone drink or an isocaloric taste- and appearance matched control drink of equal volume."Following a 10-minute warm-up at 50% VO2max, participants commenced exercise at intermittent intensity for two-minute intervals, alternating 90% PPO efforts with 50% PPO recovery. When fatigued at this intensity, the upper interval workload was decreased progressively in 10% PPO increments. Exhaustion, and protocol completion, was defined by the inability to complete two minute at 60% PPO. Each participant‟s heart rate was monitored throughout (Polar H7 heart rate monitor, Polar, Kempele, Finland) and water was consumed ad libitum" (Holdsworth 2017).
3g taurine also improve PWO glycogen resynthesis significantly | more
- The ketone drink, which had no side-effects, contained 0.573 ml/kg of the ketone ester, (R)-3-hydroxybutyl (R)-3- hydroxybutyrate (12, 13). The natural bitter taste was partially masked with citrus flavoring (Symrise, Holzminden, Germany) and proprietary sweetener (aspartame, NutraSweet™, Chicago, USA).
- The control drink contained the same citrus and sweetener components as the ketone drink. The bitter taste was matched with the addition of a weight-dosed commercial bitter agent (Symrise, Holzminden, Germany).
Evidence of performance and cognition enhancing effects as they are promised by some producers of respective supplements have yet also been observed only in rodents (Murray 2016). All evidence in favor of their ergogenic effects should yet, as pointed out by Pinckaers et al in a recent review preliminary because "there are no data available to suggest that ingestion of ketone bodies during exercise improves athletes’ performance under conditions where evidence-based nutritional strategies are applied appropriately" (Pinckaers 2016). If you want to know more about the potential and established usefulness of ketone supplements, I suggest you read their free paper.
- The technique provided a way to standardize glucose available to skeletal muscle across different visits for the same participant, and between different individuals.
- By delivering glucose intravenously, it is possible to avoid the variations in time and magnitude of glucose delivery caused by oral ingestion and enteral absorption.
- It is possible to ensure that glucose delivery to the muscle is at least as high as would be provided by the recommended optimum post-exercise carbohydrate feeding of 1.0–1.2 g/kg/h over 4-6 hours.
Further research is more than warranted: Yes, theoretically, the glucose clamp allows for very accurate measures of whole body glucose uptake. But the level of glucose in the blood is likely significantly higher than it would be for the few of you who even consume 1.0-1.2 g/kg/h glucose after their workouts. What will likewise have to be addressed is the possible influence of baseline glycogen levels and the (potentially) related genetically determined and training-induced difference in the ability to store glycogen, which appears to have been significantly higher in the subjects receiving the ketone supplement. And, if I may say that, I'd like those studies to be done by somebody else than Kieran Clark, Peter J. Cox., and David A. Holdsworth who happen to hold a patent on the very product they tested in the study at hand... shamed be who thinks evil of it ;-)
As previously hinted at, the scientists' analysis of pre- vs. post-samples they got by the means of muscle biopsies from the subjects'vastus lateralis revealed that the addition of ketones increased the glycogen storage in the subjects' skeletal muscle significantly. It is yet at least somewhat misleading when the scientists write in their abstract that "muscle glycogen was 50% higher (246 vs.164 mmolesglycosyl units/kg dry weight, p < 0.05) than after the control drink" (Holdsworth 2017), because the layman will conclude that the ketone drink triggered a 50%" increase in glycogen synthesis, when the actual comparison of the relative increases in Figure 1 (no such figure in the FT of the original study, be the way), clearly indicates that the difference is as low as 18%.
less than what I recently reported for caffeine and unquestionably less marketable than the 50% increase from the abstract you can easily misunderstand as an inter-group difference, but it is certainly more realistic in view of the fact that the 100% increase in insulin levels (31 vs. 16 mU/l, p < 0.01) sped the whole body glucose uptake (including liver, fat, splanchnic organs etc.) up by "only" 32% (1.66 vs. 1.26 g/kg, p<0.001) - to expect this increase to translate to a 50% increase in glycogen synthesis in the muscle is IMHO quite naive. After all, there's no reason to believe that the exuberant level of insulin would act, as the scientists imply. when they write that any extra glucose that was not stored in the leg musculature (the weight of which they estimate based on data from average Joes and Janes (Janssen 2000), even though their subjects were, I quote, "well-trained") "was probably incorporation into skeletal muscle glycogen", exclusively on the subjects' skeletal muscles - and that's irrespective of the fact that exercise selectively increases skeletal muscle glycogen synthesis.
Post-Workout Coffee Boosts Glycogen Repletion by Up to 30% (That's 12% More than the Real Value in the Study at Hand) and May Even Have Sign. Glucose Partitioning Effects | more |
As hinted at in the "further research necessary"-box we do now have the research that confirms or rather refutes the practical relevance of the keto-ester-induced increase in insulin and glucose uptake in a non-hyperinsulinemic clamp scenario, I would other have demanded in this bottom line.
Research that did what I demanded in the original version of this conclusion: (a) replace the intravenous infusion of glucose with the ingestion of carbohydrate-containing beverages, (b) include an insulinogenic protein like whey and (c) had subjects with similar baseline glycogen levels? At least with respect to the previously open question whether your glycogen recovery will benefit from the purchase of ketone esters, it is thus now possible to give say with some certainty that the answer is no... just like the answer to the question if it is even relevant for the average gymrat to maximize his/her post-workout glucose synthesis rates (learn more about that in my previous, general article about glycogen repletion) | Comment on Facebook!
- D'Agostino, Dominic P., et al. "Therapeutic ketosis with ketone ester delays central nervous system oxygen toxicity seizures in rats." American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 304.10 (2013): R829-R836.
- DeFronzo, Ralph A., Jordan D. Tobin, and Reubin Andres. "Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance." American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 237.3 (1979): G214-G223.
- Holdsworth David A., et al. "A Ketone Ester Drink Increases Postexercise Muscle Glycogen Synthesis in Humans." Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (2017): Ahead or print.
- Janssen, Ian, et al. "Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr." Journal of applied physiology 89.1 (2000): 81-88.
- Kashiwaya, Yoshihiro, et al. "A ketone ester diet increases brain malonyl-CoA and uncoupling proteins 4 and 5 while decreasing food intake in the normal Wistar rat." Journal of Biological Chemistry 285.34 (2010): 25950-25956.
- Laughlin, Maren R., et al. "Nonglucose substrates increase glycogen synthesis in vivo in dog heart." American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 267.1 (1994): H217-H223.
- Maizels, Evelyn Z., et al. "Effect of acetoacetate on glucose metabolism in the soleus and extensor digitorum longus muscles of the rat." Biochemical Journal 162.3 (1977): 557-568.
- Murray, Andrew J., et al. "Novel ketone diet enhances physical and cognitive performance." The FASEB Journal 30.12 (2016): 4021-4032.
- Pinckaers, Philippe JM, et al. "Ketone Bodies and Exercise Performance: The Next Magic Bullet or Merely Hype?." Sports Medicine (2016): 1-9.
- Poff, A. M., et al. "Ketone supplementation decreases tumor cell viability and prolongs survival of mice with metastatic cancer." International journal of cancer 135.7 (2014): 1711-1720.
- Vandoorne, T., et al. "Intake of a Ketone Ester drink during Recovery from Exercise promotes mTORC1 signalling but not Glycogen Resynthesis in Human Muscle." Front. Physiol. (2017): Ahead or print | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00310