750kcal/day Deficit Approach to "Cutting" Beats Cautious 300kcal/day Deficit: Almost 2kg Fat in 4 Weeks + No Decline in Testosterone or Muscle Loss in Lean Athletes

Even in lean athletes dieting does not have to cost muscle mass.

One of the commonest reasons people don't achieve the physique of their dreams is fear! The fear of losing muscle weight on a "cut" and the fear of gaining fat weight on a "bulk". The study at hand confirms: There is no reason to be afraid of cutting.

In the course of the four-week cutting period in the study at hand, the subjects, 20-35 year-old national and international level Finnish track and field male athletes from jumping and short distance running events (e.g. 100-200m) with already low body fat percentages lost another ~2% body fat, and no muscle in spite of a highly significant 750kcal/day deficit.
In contrast to the guys who had been randomized to the "high energy deficit" group, the guys who ended up in 300kcal/day deficit group aka the"afraid of losing muscle group", lost neither muscle nor fat weight - and I bet, they did not feel significantly less hungry.

Figure 1: Changes in body fat and lean mass in grams (Huovinen. 2014)

The data in Figure 1 which is the outcome of a controlled 4-week study in the course of which the subjects were advised to cut fat and carbs and keep their protein intake stable make a clear statement: Trying to cut with a caloric deficit of only 300kcal/day is a waste of time" ... at least for someone who starts with a body fat percentage of only 10%, as the subjects in the study at hand did.

Figure 2: Pre- and post protein, fat and carbohydrate intake (in g/kg/day) according to subjects' food logs which had to be kept for the whole study period (Huovinen. 2014)

As you can see in Figure 2 the subjects did as they were told and cut back on both fat and carbohydrates - in conjunction with the physical activity this is certainly the key to lean body mass and performance maintenance.

"The  counter-movement  jump  and  20-m  sprint  time  improved  consistently  (p  ≤ 0.05)  only in HWR (-700kcal/day), by 2.6 ± 2.5 cm and 0.04 ± 0.04 s, respectively. Finally, athletes with a fat percentage 10% or over at the baseline were able to preserve FFM." (Huovinen. 2014)

Whether that's also the reason that the scientists did not observe significant differences in serum testosterone in either of the two groups is questionable (Testosterone / cortisol: 33.6 (pre) vs. 38.3 (post)), though - especially in view of previous results like those I wrote about in the following two articles:

• "High or Low Protein Intakes Have Profound Influence on Testosterone, SHBG, Estrogen, Cortisol & Co?" (learn more) and 
• "High Protein Diets Don't Counter Anti-Anabolic Effects of Low Energy Intake" (learn more)

It's more likely that the 27.1kcal/kg of body weight, the subjects in the 700kcal/day diet consumed were still more than enough to cover the basic energy requirements. With an average body weight of ~75kg that's still more than 2,000kcal and thus way more than the average starvation diet of the average overweight person will deliver.
Reference:

• Huovinen et al. "Body Composition And Power Performance Improved After Weight Reduction In Male Athletes Without Hampering Hormonal Balance." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Publish Ahead of Print DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000619