I have to admit: Given the high linoleic (N6) acid content of most of the commonly used plant oils in the Western diet, deficiencies are probably rare occur (if at all) mostly in clinical settings. |
One of the reasons that the opinions on human essential fatty acid requirement diverge in the aforementioned ways is that scientific evidence to form an educated unbiased opinion on how much of these precious fats we actually need is scarce.
More important than basal fatty acid requirement are the correct frying oils
What's even worse, though, is the fact that a recent paper by scientists from the INRA and the Université Paris-Sud XI in Paris suggests that we may have overestimated the omega-6 requirements significantly.Why? Well, the reason lies in the absurd design of corresponding rodent studies - and I am not using the bullshit killer argument that "mice are no little men" (go and conduct a human study if that's all you have to offer), but rather the mislead, albeit downright scientific desire to eliminate all confounding factors and design a "flawless", and thus eventually unrealistic experiment.
Figure 1: Graphical overview of the study design | the numbers indicate the content of LA(N6) and ALA (N3) of the test diets the scientists used to identify the basal requirements (Choque. 2015). |
Table 1: The biological activities related to linoleic (N6) or linolenic (N3) have long been established (Holman. 1971). |
"The first dose–response studies of LA requirements in rats have been corrupted by an unintentional exclusion of ALA (Holman. 1971), leading to a significant overestimation of the dietary requirement for dietary LA (Cunnane. 2003). The n-3 and n-6 families have been known to be nutritionally different, with different biological functions; nevertheless, dietary ALA deficiency could affect physiological parameters similar to LA deficiency.Furthermore, more recent results show that the mere lack of omega-6s in the diet won't suffice to induce a complete depletion of the abundant linoleic acid stores in the adipose and other organ tissue of mammals (Guesnet. 2011). Against that background it was necessary to revisit the basic mammalian omega-6 requirement in a non-omega-3 deficient scenario where the stored linoleic acid would not mess with the study outcomes.
For instance, several studies on rats have shown that the dietary intake of 0.5 en% from ALA could prevent the biological (growth, reproduction and early development) and biochemical functions with a LA intake as low as 0.3 en% (Greenberg. 1950; Bourre. 1990)" (Choque. 2015).
Requirements are nice, but what's your recommendation? My recommendations includes (1) to eat fish 1-2 times per week or alternatively use fish oil 1g/day is enough if you are not chronically inflamed, (2) to use high MUFA cooking oils and thus avoid a PUFA overload and (3) to get your omega-6s from the foods you eat - there is more than enough linoleic acid in eggs, meats & co.
Accordingly, the present study was especially designed to create a specific and strong deficiency in linoleic acid (LA) by depriving not just the test animals, but also the maternal diet of LA. In that, the main purpose of the present study was to carry out a dose-response study on a male rat model in order to determine the minimal intake of dietary LA required to avoid n-6 deficiency symptoms, when ALA is included in the diet. The procedure involved two basic steps:- This first step determined whether the n-6, n-3 and n-9 fatty acid compositions in the tissue of the growing male rats could be affected by the nutritional status of their mothers, and it helped to obtain a powerful deficiency model. Moreover, the scientists studied whether an adequate intake of 0·5 en% from ALA in growing male rats could partly prevent or not growth and other markers of LA deficiency in the present model.
- The second step was performed using the optimised conditions of deficiency, in order to determine the dietary LA requirement in the presence of ALA in growing male rats.
Table 2: Summary of the different diet effects on physiological and biochemical criteria (Choque. 2015). |
Find out which oils you should use for frying and which you should better avoid if you like being healthy here. |
Rather than that olive and other high MUFA, as well as the the occasional coconut oil and the dietary fats you get from fish (for omega-3s) and other whole foods (including eggs, beef, pork, and all the allegedly "bad stuff") are the fat sources with the most credible and abundant backup from peer-reviewed research. If you make these the major source of your dietary fat intake, you certainly won't have to worry about linoleic acid deficiencies or excess | Comment on Facebook!
- Bourre, J. M., et al. "Dietary linoleic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids in rat brain and other organs. Minimal requirements of linoleic acid." Lipids 25.8 (1990): 465-472.
- Choque et al. "Dietary linoleic acid requirements in the presence of a-linolenic acid are lower than the historical 2 % of energy intake value, study in rats." British Journal of Nutrition (2015): Published Online Ahead of Print.
- Cunnane, Stephen C. "Problems with essential fatty acids: time for a new paradigm?." Progress in lipid research 42.6 (2003): 544-568.
- Greenberg, Samuel M., and Harry J. Deuel. "The protective effect of high fat diets on immature rats fed thyroid." The Journal of nutrition 42.2 (1950): 279-284.
- Guesnet, P., et al. "α-Linolenate reduces the dietary requirement for linoleate in the growing rat." Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids 85.6 (2011): 353-360.
- Holman, Ralph T. "Biological activities of and requirements for polyunsaturated acids." Progress in the Chemistry of Fats and other Lipids 9 (1971): 607-682.