read more).
Now, a recent study from the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences shows that the question whether "cardio" in the broadest sense will interfere with strength training gains cannot be answered with a simple yes or no.
Eight trained males performed, in a randomized fashion, two sessions of heavy resistance exercise (RE) with the triceps muscles, where one session was preceded by intervals of high-intensity cycling (E+RE), 5 x 4 min at 85% of VO2 peak. Mixed muscle protein fractional synthetic rate (FSR) was measured at rest, prior to exercise, and during a 3 hour recovery period following exercise by continuous infusion of L-[ring-13C6] phenylalanine. Muscle biopsies from the triceps brachii was collected twice at rest separated by three hours, directly after resistance exercise and following 90 and 180 min of recovery. Signalling in the mTORC1-and AMPK-pathway was assessed using western blot technique.
Even in studies evaluating the effects on identical muscle groups, the results are ambiguous: While there are many studies which found negative effects of concomitant training on muscle size gains, there are also studies which found no effects (e.g. McCarthy. 1992) and studies like Lundberg et al. (2013) which found beneficial effects on muscle gains in a study that combined aerobic training and leg extensions in one session (see Figure on the left). It is thus unwarranted to try to give a one size fits it all answer with respect to the interference of endurance and strength training, when it comes to its effects on the amount of muscle you gain. It is important to point out that the same amount of work with regard to load, total number of repetitions and total time under tension was performed in the two trials.
The same goes for the signalling protein AMPK and eEF2, as well as for the alleged protein synthesis gauge mTOR which was increased by 76% and 108% above rest directly after the E+RE and RE, respectively, and remained elevated in both trials during the entire recovery period.
Practically speaking, this means that despite non-significantly lower mTOR levels in the HIIT + weight training session (E+RE) the protein synthesis in your biceps or other muscles that were not used during the previous cardio training will not be impaired. Obviously, it remains to be seen, whether this means that you can gain the exact same amount of muscle with concomitant training vs. weight training, alone.
In view of the fact that not all studies found differences, it appears not totally far-fetched to assume that the interference may depend on the type of aerobic activity and the muscles that are involved | Comment on Facebook!References:
Now, a recent study from the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences shows that the question whether "cardio" in the broadest sense will interfere with strength training gains cannot be answered with a simple yes or no.
Are you looking for muscle builders for the year 2015? Find inspiration in these articles:
In their study, Moberg, et al. (2014)set out to conduct a series of studies to examine the influence of endurance exercise on the acute stimulatory effect of resistance exercise on anabolic processes. To this ends, the effect of endurance exercise on a previously inactive muscle was investigated. The aim was to examine the influence of resistance exercise on mTORC1-signaling and rate of protein synthesis in the triceps brachii muscle with or without preceding intervals of high-intensity cycling. Eight trained males performed, in a randomized fashion, two sessions of heavy resistance exercise (RE) with the triceps muscles, where one session was preceded by intervals of high-intensity cycling (E+RE), 5 x 4 min at 85% of VO2 peak. Mixed muscle protein fractional synthetic rate (FSR) was measured at rest, prior to exercise, and during a 3 hour recovery period following exercise by continuous infusion of L-[ring-13C6] phenylalanine. Muscle biopsies from the triceps brachii was collected twice at rest separated by three hours, directly after resistance exercise and following 90 and 180 min of recovery. Signalling in the mTORC1-and AMPK-pathway was assessed using western blot technique.
Individual and group mean increase (%) in m. quadricep muscle volume following resistance training with (AE+RE) or without (RE) concurrent aerobic exercise (Lundberg. 2013). |
The same goes for the signalling protein AMPK and eEF2, as well as for the alleged protein synthesis gauge mTOR which was increased by 76% and 108% above rest directly after the E+RE and RE, respectively, and remained elevated in both trials during the entire recovery period.
Practically speaking, this means that despite non-significantly lower mTOR levels in the HIIT + weight training session (E+RE) the protein synthesis in your biceps or other muscles that were not used during the previous cardio training will not be impaired. Obviously, it remains to be seen, whether this means that you can gain the exact same amount of muscle with concomitant training vs. weight training, alone.
In view of the fact that not all studies found differences, it appears not totally far-fetched to assume that the interference may depend on the type of aerobic activity and the muscles that are involved | Comment on Facebook!
- Lundberg, Tommy R., et al. "Aerobic exercise does not compromise muscle hypertrophy response to short-term resistance training." Journal of Applied Physiology 114.1 (2013): 81-89.
- McCarthy, J., et al. "Combined strength and endurance training: Functional and morphological adaptations to ten weeks of training." No. NHRC-92-26. Naval Health Research Center San Diego CA, 1992.
- Moberg, Marcus, et al. "High-intensity cycling performed prior to resistance exercise does not influence mTORC1-signaling and the rate of muscle protein synthesis in the triceps brachii." 19th annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, 2-5 July 2014, Amsterdam The Netherlands. 2014.